Zach Raknerud is his opponent, endorsed by the Democratic-NPL earlier this year.
You wouldn’t expect these two candidates to find much to agree about, but during a debate I hosted on this episode of the Plain Talk, the two agreed on more than you might expect.
They found common ground on issues ranging from criminal justice reform, civil asset forfeiture, marijuana, and even Measure 3, a constitutional amendment on the statewide ballot this fall.
On Measure 3, specifically, Armstrong called the proposal “horrible.”
While Raknerud said he needed to read up more on the measure, which would make dramatic changes to the state’s political process including a ban on political party primaries and the use of ranked-choice voting on the statewide ballot, he said it’s “troubling.” He finds himself in “some agreement” with Armstrong’s criticisms, not specifically that he believes the political parties should “have a voice” in primaries.
Each candidate supports the legalization of marijuana, though while Raknerud said he’d support that reform at the federal level, Armstrong said he’d rather the states take the lead.
Where the candidates had sharp disagreements was on social reforms from health care to the social safety net. Armstrong said Raknerud’s proposals, including university government health care and a universal basic income, would cost at least $60 trillion, and accused his opponent of being a proponent of the “socialist Bernie Sanders model.”
Raknerud countered by arguing that each plank in his policy platform is paid for by with adjustments to revenue. Armstrong derided this as tax hikes. Raknerud called it “capturing” wealth that’s not yet part of the government’s revenues.
To subscribe to the podcast, click here.