Skim is in: CT lawmakers want to ban whole milk in day cares
By Eric Boehm | Watchdog.org
A bill proposed by a trio of state lawmakers in Connecticut would prohibit day-care centers from feeding whole milk or 2-percent milk to any child older than 2. The bills’ sponsors say it’s part of an effort to curb childhood obesity.
We’re not even talking about so-called “raw milk,” the unpasteurized, straight-from-the-cow-to-your-lips product banned in one form or another by just about every state.
SKIM OR NOTHING: A proposed ban in Connecticut would keep kids off the heavy milk after they turned two.
We’re talking about whole milk here, people.
State Sen. Catherine Osten, D-New London; state Rep. Roberta Willis, D-Litchfield; and state Rep. David Zoni, D-Hartford, did not return calls for comment, but their legislation says the goal is to establish nutritional standards for day cares.
Let’s give them a little bit of the benefit of the doubt.
Sure, whole milk is pretty loaded with fats. And just because kids have been drinking it for decades — nay, centuries — doesn’t necessarily mean we shouldn’t examine the health risks of guzzling gallons of the creamy stuff.
But is skim milk really that much better?
Actually, skim milk is pretty disgusting — aside from the fact it looks like milky water rather than watery milk — because it’s processed a whole lot more than whole milk.
All those treatments might actually make skim milk worse for you because they oxidize the cholesterol in the milk and make it easier for your body to absorb it.
Which is not to say that low-fat milk is worse for you, but the benefits of drinking it and feeding it to kids seem to be marginal at best and possibly downright non-existent when you look at some of the trade-offs.
A study published last year in Archives of Disease in Childhood found that kids who drink low-fat milk are actually more likely to be obese.
WHAT ABOUT SCIENCE: It says “skim” right in the name, so it must be healthier, right? Not exactly. Studies show that drinking skim milk might actually increase childhood obesity.
“Our original hypothesis was that children who drank high-fat milk, either whole milk or 2 (percent) would be heavier because they were consuming more saturated-fat calories. We were really surprised when we looked at the data and it was very clear that within every ethnicity and every socioeconomic strata, that it was actually the opposite, that children who drank skim milk and 1 (percent) were heavier than those who drank 2 (percent) and whole,” study author Dr. Mark Daniel DeBoer, an associate professor of pediatric endocrinology at the University of Virginia School of Medicine, told Time Magazine in March 2013.
So the lawmakers are just plain wrong to suggest that this effort at child care micro-management from Hartford would actually curb obesity and turn Connecticut’s kids into the nation’s leanest toddlers.
But that’s not really the point here. The point is that lawmakers are trying to tell parents and trained child-care specialists what they are allowed to pump into their 5 year-olds, which is a decision probably best left to those parents and child-care specialists.
In other words, if your child’s doctor says your child should drink skim milk because of body type and dietary needs, crack open the skim. But just because Mason needs low-fat milk in his lunch doesn’t mean that Sofia, Aiden and Hannah need it, too.
The same bill also regulates the amount of juice children are allowed to consume on a daily basis — no juice at all to children younger than 8 months and no more than six ounces of juice per day to older kids. It must be 100 percent juice.
For their efforts at legislative parenting, the aforementioned lawmakers win our “nanny state of the week” award. They get a tall glass of warm skim milk and an endless loop of children crying on tape.
Contact Eric Boehm at EBoehm@Watchdog.org and follow @WatchdogOrg and @EricBoehm87 on Twitter for more.
