Reminder: Marsy’s Law Is Still an Absolute Mess Which Has Done Very Little to Help Victims

Kathleen Wrigley, chair of the Marsy's Law for North Dakota ballot measure, announces Tuesday, Dec. 15, 2015, in Fargo the measure for the November 2016 ballot with the sooty of area victims' rights advocates. Michael Vosburg / Forum Photo Editor

Back during the 2016 election cycle North Dakota voters cast their ballots overwhelmingly for Marsy’s Law, a constitutional amendment that was the hobby horse of (recently indicted) California billionaire Henry Nicholas.

Critics of the measure (including this humble observer) argued that the amendment would make a mess out of existing laws and policies governing the criminal justice system while simultaneously doing very little to help victims.

Today, courtesy of Bismarck Tribune reporter Jack Dura, comes a reminder that we critics were right:

With a raging national debate over use of force by law enforcement, here in North Dakota the public is routinely denied information about the officers who use force because they invoke their constitutional rights under Marsy’s Law as victims.

And the only way to fix that problem is another vote to amend the constitution again.

This is the problem with the initiated measure process. It asks the mercurial, often distracted and apathetic electorate to enact complicated public policy at the ballot box. Usually while heavily influenced by deep-pocketed, out of state interests like Nicholas (or Hollywood celebrities) who can not only pay to collect the signatures to put their pet projects on the ballot but then drown out opposition with slick PR campaigns.

The initiated measure process is a good way to enact terrible public policy like Marsy’s Law.

Rob Port is the editor of SayAnythingBlog.com, a columnist for the Forum News Service, and the host of the Rob (Re)Port on Fargo-based WDAY AM970 from noon-2pm weekdays.

Related posts

Top